Pro- and antislavery activists flooded into the new Kansas territory, each side seeking to turn popular sovereignty to their own advantage. There was no question that Nebraska would be a free state, but the fate of its southern neighbor, Kansas, became a matter of fierce debate. In the North, where abolitionist feeling was growing, many condemned Douglas for striking down the Missouri Compromise and paving the way for slavery’s extension into the territories, rather than its ultimate extinction. government, and all were eventually forced to move south to reservations in what is now Oklahoma. In the months before the bill’s passage, most of the Native American groups living on the land in question signed treaties ceding their land to the U.S. President Franklin Pierce signed it into law on May 30, 1854. Settlers in each territory would vote on the issue of whether to permit slavery or not, according to the principle of popular sovereignty.ĭespite fierce opposition from abolitionists and Free Soilers, as those who opposed extending slavery into new territories were known, the Senate passed the Nebraska bill. To get them, he added an amendment that repealed the Missouri Compromise and created two new territories, Kansas and Nebraska. In 1821, the Missouri Compromise had outlawed slavery everywhere in the remaining Louisiana Purchase lands north of the 36º 30’ parallel, and the two proposed territories lay north of this line.ĭouglas needed proslavery votes to pass his “Nebraska Bill,” as it was known at the time. Southern slaveholders and their allies in Congress opposed Douglas’ initial bill to organize the Nebraska Territory. Douglas wanted the railroad to be built along a northern route that would go through Chicago as well as a vast area of land known as the Nebraska Territory, which had been included in the Louisiana Purchase. He was also a big booster of the planned transcontinental railroad, which would provide faster, more reliable transportation across the country. Known as the “Little Giant,” Douglas was one of the country’s most prominent politicians by 1854, and was seen as a likely future president. Introduction of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 But the Compromise of 1850 (especially the strict new Fugitive Slave Act it contained) galvanized the abolitionist movement and fueled mounting debate over whether the institution of slavery should be allowed to expand along with the nation. By its terms, California entered the Union as a free state, while the territories of Utah, New Mexico, Nevada and Arizona (all acquired in the Mexican-American War) were left to decide for themselves whether to permit slavery within their borders.ĭid you know? Kansas was admitted as a free state in January 1861 only weeks after eight Southern states seceded from the union.ĭouglas hoped this idea of “popular sovereignty” would resolve the mounting debate over the future of slavery in the United States and enable the country to expand westward with few obstacles. By the end of 1850, Senator Henry Clay (with Douglas’ help) had persuaded Congress to accept the Compromise of 1850. As California had banned slavery, its admission to the Union would upset the fragile balance between slave and free states. The discovery of gold in California in 1849, and California’s subsequent request to become a state, sparked a fierce battle in Congress. Its passage intensified the bitter debate over slavery in the United States, which would later explode into the Civil War. Known as the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the controversial bill raised the possibility that slavery could be extended into territories where it had once been banned. In 1854, Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois proposed a bill to organize the Territory of Nebraska, a vast area of land that would become Kansas, Nebraska, Montana and the Dakotas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |